Brillantes v. Yorac
G.R. No. 93867 December
18, 1990
Cruz, J.
Facts:
The
petitioner is challenging the designation by the President of the Philippines of
Associate Commissioner Haydee B. Yorac as Acting Chairman of the Commission on Elections,
in place of Chairman Hilario B. Davide, who had been named chairman of the fact-finding
commission to investigate the December 1989 coup d’ etat attempt.
The petitioner contends
that the choice of the Acting Chairman of the Commission on Elections is an internal
matter that should be resolved by the members themselves and that the intrusion
of the President of the Philippines violates their independence. He cites the practice
in the Supreme Court, where the senior Associate Justice serves as Acting Chief
Justice in the absence of the Chief Justice. No designation from the President of
the Philippines is necessary.
Issue:
whether
the designation of an Acting Chairman of COMELEC is unconstitutional
Held:
Yes.
Article
IX-A, Section 1, of the Constitution expressly describes all the Constitutional
Commissions as “independent.” Although essentially executive in nature, they are
not under the control of the President of the Philippines in the discharge of their
respective functions. Each of these Commissions conducts its own proceedings under
the applicable laws and its own rules and in the exercise of its own discretion.
Its decisions, orders and rulings are subject only to review on Certiorari
by the Supreme Court as provided by the Constitution in Article IX-A, Section 7.
The choice of a temporary chairman in the absence
of the regular chairman comes under that discretion. That discretion cannot be exercised
for it, even with its consent, by the President of the Philippines.
In the choice of the Acting
Chairman, the members of the Commission on Elections would most likely have been
guided by the seniority rule as they themselves would have appreciated it. In any
event, that choice and the basis thereof were for them and not the President to
make.
No comments:
Post a Comment