Aquino v. COMELEC
G.R. No.
120265, September 18, 1995
Kapunan, J.
Facts:
On
20 March 1995, Agapito A. Aquino filed his Certificate of Candidacy for the
position of Representative for the new Second Legislative District of Makati
City. In his certificate of candidacy, Aquino stated that he was a resident of
the aforementioned district for 10 months. Faced with a petition for
disqualification, he amended the entry on his residency in his certificate of
candidacy to 1 year and 13 days. The Commission on Elections dismissed the
petition on 6 May and allowed Aquino to run in the election of 8 May. Aquino
won. Acting on a motion for reconsideration of the above dismissal, the
Commission on Election later issued an order suspending the proclamation of
Aquino until the Commission resolved the issue. On 2 June, the Commission on
Elections found Aquino ineligible and disqualified for the elective office for
lack of constitutional qualification of residence.
Issue:
whether
“residency” in the certificate of candidacy actually connotes “domicile” to
warrant the disqualification of Aquino from the position in the electoral
district
Held:
The
place “where a party actually or constructively has his permanent home,” where
he, no matter where he may be found at any given time, eventually intends to
return and remain, i.e., his domicile, is that to which the Constitution refers
when it speaks of residence for the purposes of election law. The purpose is to
exclude strangers or newcomers unfamiliar with the conditions and needs of the
community from taking advantage of favorable circumstances existing in that
community for electoral gain. Aquino’s certificate of candidacy in a previous
(1992) election indicates that he was a resident and a registered voter of San
Jose, Concepcion, Tarlac for more than 52 years prior to that election.
Aquino’s connection to the Second District of Makati City is an alleged lease
agreement of a condominium unit in the area. The intention not to establish a
permanent home in Makati City is evident in his leasing a condominium unit
instead of buying one. The short length of time he claims to be a resident of
Makati (and the fact of his stated domicile in Tarlac and his claims of other residences
in Metro Manila) indicate that his sole purpose in transferring his physical
residence is not to acquire a new, residence or domicile but only to qualify as
a candidate for Representative of the Second District of Makati City. Aquino
was thus rightfully disqualified by the Commission on Elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment