Garcia v Executive Secretary
Facts:
On
27 November 1990, Cory issued EO 438 which imposed, in addition to any other
duties, taxes and charges imposed by law on all articles imported into the
Philippines, an additional duty of 5% ad valorem. This additional duty was
imposed across the board on all imported articles, including crude oil and
other oil products imported into the Philippines. In 1991, EO 443 increased the
additional duty to 9%. In the same year, EO 475 was passed reinstating the
previous 5% duty except that crude oil and other oil products continued to be
taxed at 9%. Garcia, a representative from Bataan, avers that EO 475 and 478
are unconstitutional for they violate Sec 24 of Art 6 of the Constitution which
provides: " All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills authorizing
increase of the public debt, bills of local application, and private bills
shall originate exclusively in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may
propose or concur with amendments." He contends that since the
Constitution vests the authority to enact revenue bills in Congress, the
President may not assume such power of issuing Executive Orders Nos. 475 and
478 which are in the nature of revenue-generating measures.
Issue:
whether
or not EO 475 and 478 are unconstitutional
Held:
Under
Section 24, Article VI of the Constitution, the enactment of appropriation,
revenue and tariff bills, like all other bills is, of course, within the
province of the Legislative rather than the Executive Department. It does not
follow, however, that therefore Executive Orders Nos. 475 and 478, assuming
they may be characterized as revenue measures, are prohibited to the President,
that they must be enacted instead by the Congress of the Philippines. Section
28(2) of Article VI of the Constitution provides as follows: "(2) The
Congress may, by law, authorize the President to fix within specified limits,
and subject to such limitations and restrictions as it may impose, tariff
rates, import and export quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues, and other duties or
imposts within the framework of the national development program of the
Government." There is thus explicit constitutional permission to Congress
to authorize the President "subject to such limitations and restrictions
as [Congress] may impose" to fix "within specific limits"
"tariff rates . . . and other duties or imposts . . . ."
No comments:
Post a Comment