Merritt v. Government of the Philippine Islands
G.R. No. L-11154
March 21, 1916
Trent, J.
Facts:
When
the plaintiff, riding on a motorcycle, was going toward the western part of Calle
Padre Faura, passing along the west side thereof at a speed of ten to twelve miles
an hour, upon crossing Taft Avenue and when he was ten feet from the southwestern
intersection of said streets, the General Hospital ambulance, upon reaching said
avenue, instead of turning toward the south, after passing the center thereof, so
that it would be on the left side of said avenue, as is prescribed by the ordinance
and the Motor Vehicle Act, turned suddenly and unexpectedly and long before reaching
the center of the street, into the right side of Taft Avenue, without having sounded
any whistle or horn, by which movement it struck the plaintiff, who was already
six feet from the southwestern point or from the post place there.
By reason of the
resulting collision, the plaintiff was so severely injured that, according to Dr.
Saleeby, who examined him on the very same day that he was taken to the General
Hospital, he was suffering from a depression in the left parietal region and in
the back part of his head, while blood issued from his nose and he was entirely
unconscious.
Issue:
considering
that the negligence which caused the collision is a tort committed by an agent or
employee of the Government, whether the Government is legally-liable for the damages
resulting therefrom
Held:
No.
Act No. 2457, effective February 3, 1915, reads:
An Act authorizing E. Merritt to bring suit against
the Government of the Philippine Islands and authorizing the Attorney-General of
said Islands to appear in said suit.
Whereas a claim has been filed against the Government
of the Philippine Islands by Mr. E. Merritt, of Manila, for damages resulting from
a collision between his motorcycle and the ambulance of the General Hospital on
March twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred and thirteen;
Whereas it is not known who is responsible for the accident
nor is it possible to determine the amount of damages, if any, to which the claimant
is entitled; and
Whereas the Director of Public Works and the Attorney-General
recommended that an Act be passed by the Legislature authorizing Mr. E. Merritt
to bring suit in the courts against the Government, in order that said questions
may be decided: Now, therefore,
By authority of the United States, be it enacted by
the Philippine Legislature, that:
SECTION 1. E. Merritt is hereby authorized to bring
suit in the Court of First Instance of the city of Manila against the Government
of the Philippine Islands in order to fix the responsibility for the collision between
his motorcycle and the ambulance of the General Hospital, and to determine the amount
of the damages, if any, to which Mr. E. Merritt is entitled on account of said collision,
and the Attorney-General of the Philippine Islands is hereby authorized and directed
to appear at the trial on the behalf of the Government of said Islands, to defendant
said Government at the same.
SEC. 2. This Act shall take effect on its passage.
Enacted, February 3, 1915.
Did the defendant,
in enacting the above quoted Act, simply waive its immunity from suit or did it
also concede its liability to the plaintiff? If only the former, then it cannot
be held that the Act created any new cause of action in favor of the plaintiff or
extended the defendant’s liability to any case not previously recognized.
All admit that
the Insular Government (the defendant) cannot be sued by an individual without its
consent. It is also admitted that the instant case is one against the Government.
As the consent of the Government to be sued by the plaintiff was entirely voluntary
on its part, it is our duty to look carefully into the terms of the consent, and
render judgment accordingly.
No claim arises against any government is favor of an individual, by reason
of the misfeasance, laches, or unauthorized exercise of powers by its officers or
agents.
By
consenting to be sued a state simply waives its immunity from suit. It does not
thereby concede its liability to plaintiff, or create any cause of action in his
favor, or extend its liability to any cause not previously recognized. It merely
gives a remedy to enforce a preexisting liability and submits itself to the jurisdiction
of the court, subject to its right to interpose any lawful defense.
Act
No. 2457 does not operate to extend the Government’s liability to any cause not
previously recognized, we will now examine the substantive law touching the defendant’s
liability for the negligent acts of its officers, agents, and employees. Paragraph
5 of article 1903 of the Civil Code reads:
The state is liable in this sense when it acts through
a special agent, but not when the damage should have been caused by the official
to whom properly it pertained to do the act performed, in which case the provisions
of the preceding article shall be applicable.
The responsibility
of the state is limited by article 1903 to the case wherein it acts through a special
agent (and a special agent, in the sense in which these words are employed, is one
who receives a definite and fixed order or commission, foreign to the exercise of
the duties of his office if he is a special official) so that in representation
of the state and being bound to act as an agent thereof, he executes the trust confided
to him. This concept does not apply to any executive agent who is an employee of
the acting administration and who on his own responsibility performs the functions
which are inherent in and naturally pertain to his office and which are regulated
by law and the regulations.
The
State (the Government of the Philippine Islands) is only liable for the acts of
its agents, officers and employees when they act as special agents within the meaning
of paragraph 5 of article 1903, supra, and that the chauffeur of the ambulance of
the General Hospital was not such an agent.
No comments:
Post a Comment