Virtuoso v. Municipal Judge of Mariveles, Bataan
G.R. No. L-47841
March 21, 1978
Fernando, J.
Facts:
Petitioner
Francisco Virtouso, Jr., who filed an application for the writ of habeas corpus
on February 23, 1978, premised his plea for liberty primarily on the ground that
the pre examination which led to the issuance of a warrant of arrest against him
was a useless formality as respondent Municipal Judge of Mariveles, Bataan, failed
to meet the strict standard required by the Constitution to ascertain whether there
was a probable cause. He likewise alleged that aside from the constitutional infirmity
that tainted the procedure followed in the preliminary examination, the bail imposed
was clearly excessive. It was in the amount of Pl6,000.00, the alleged robbery of
a TV set being imputed to petitioner. As prayed for, the Court issued a writ of
habeas corpus. Respondent Judge justified the issuance of the warrant of arrest,
alleging that there was no impropriety in the way the preliminary examination was
conducted. As to the excessive character of the bail, he asserted that while it
was fixed in accordance with the Revised Bail Bond Guide issued by the Executive
Judge of Bataan in 1977, he nevertheless reduced the amount to P 8,000.00.
Issue:
whether
or not petitioner should be released on recognizance
Held:
Yes.
Petitioner is a seventeen-year old minor entitled to the protection and benefits
of the Child and Youth Welfare Code. A youthful offender is defined therein as
“one who is over nine years but under eighteen years of age at the time of the commission
of the offense.” As such, he could be provisionally released on recognizance in
the discretion of a court.
Obiter:
Courts
should, whenever appropriate, give vitality and force to the Youth and Welfare Code,
which is an implementation of this specific constitutional mandate: “The State recognizes
the vital role of the youth in nation-building and shall promote their physical,
intellectual, and social well-being.”
No comments:
Post a Comment